Would it be right to define sexual orientation just by sexual attraction b/c there r other forms of attraction

No it's not all about just sexual attraction, in my opinion. Humans are sexual beings, so it would not be fair to identify someone based just on sexual attraction. I think there's more to it than that, such as being able to have relationships with someone of the sex they desire. That's what really counts. If a woman loves her girlfriend {but finds a man sexy now and then but doesn't want sex or a relationship with men} is still a lesbian. Same goes for men who know a sexy looking man but there's no desire to actually have sex with a man or date a man - he is not gay. It's where your heart is. Sexual orientation is not actually based on just sex.


It sounds nice to want to live without lables, but this is part of how people identify themselves and it's your right to do so.

Would it be right to define sexual orientation just by sexual attraction b/c there r other forms of attraction
Sexual orientation would be defined by sexual attraction.
Reply:wait WhAt!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply:Well, sexual attraction in general defines sexual orientation. But then again, some (though rare) people are asexual but still have romantic feelings %26amp; relationships.
Reply:This is where things get so complicated because of labels...





Just "be". Do what makes you happy as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else. People get so dragged down trying to define themselves.





As corny as it sounds "follow your heart".